zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. ajsnig+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-24 19:42:09
ClosedAI
replies(2): >>ithkui+L1 >>nabaki+U1
◧
2. ithkui+L1[view] [source] 2024-01-24 19:53:48
>>ajsnig+(OP)
ShutAI
replies(1): >>barbaz+J2
◧
3. nabaki+U1[view] [source] 2024-01-24 19:54:56
>>ajsnig+(OP)
If we spontaneously start calling them ClosedAI, it's similar enough that people will still know who we're talking about. Maybe we should start calling them ClosedAI from now on
replies(3): >>robotn+Z6 >>JumpCr+Fd >>Sebgue+Al
◧◩
4. barbaz+J2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 19:59:39
>>ithkui+L1
that sounds like an app that helps you to sleep better using ai
replies(1): >>otalp+q4
◧◩◪
5. otalp+q4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:09:35
>>barbaz+J2
Pretty catchy name for that too! I would grab the domain name if i could
replies(1): >>barbaz+ca
◧◩
6. robotn+Z6[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:22:45
>>nabaki+U1
Ive been doing that myself in discussions about them. I hope it catches on, what a joke that they are still called 'Open'AI
◧◩◪◨
7. barbaz+ca[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:41:03
>>otalp+q4
> Registered in: 2020

too late

◧◩
8. JumpCr+Fd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 21:00:45
>>nabaki+U1
> people will still know who we're talking about

Sure? It’s like the folks who write $MSFT instead of Microsoft. I know what they mean. But it’s going to cheapen their argument for anyone who doesn’t already agree with them.

◧◩
9. Sebgue+Al[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 21:54:49
>>nabaki+U1
This has the same energy as Micro$oft.
[go to top]