zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. sackfi+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-24 19:40:53
They really need a rebranding.
replies(4): >>ajsnig+b >>dkjaud+D4 >>antice+lk >>blibbl+4l
◧
2. ajsnig+b[view] [source] 2024-01-24 19:42:09
>>sackfi+(OP)
ClosedAI
replies(2): >>ithkui+W1 >>nabaki+52
◧◩
3. ithkui+W1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 19:53:48
>>ajsnig+b
ShutAI
replies(1): >>barbaz+U2
◧◩
4. nabaki+52[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 19:54:56
>>ajsnig+b
If we spontaneously start calling them ClosedAI, it's similar enough that people will still know who we're talking about. Maybe we should start calling them ClosedAI from now on
replies(3): >>robotn+a7 >>JumpCr+Qd >>Sebgue+Ll
◧◩◪
5. barbaz+U2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 19:59:39
>>ithkui+W1
that sounds like an app that helps you to sleep better using ai
replies(1): >>otalp+B4
◧◩◪◨
6. otalp+B4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:09:35
>>barbaz+U2
Pretty catchy name for that too! I would grab the domain name if i could
replies(1): >>barbaz+na
◧
7. dkjaud+D4[view] [source] 2024-01-24 20:10:01
>>sackfi+(OP)
MoMoneyAI
◧◩◪
8. robotn+a7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:22:45
>>nabaki+52
Ive been doing that myself in discussions about them. I hope it catches on, what a joke that they are still called 'Open'AI
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. barbaz+na[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 20:41:03
>>otalp+B4
> Registered in: 2020

too late

◧◩◪
10. JumpCr+Qd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 21:00:45
>>nabaki+52
> people will still know who we're talking about

Sure? It’s like the folks who write $MSFT instead of Microsoft. I know what they mean. But it’s going to cheapen their argument for anyone who doesn’t already agree with them.

◧
11. antice+lk[view] [source] 2024-01-24 21:43:22
>>sackfi+(OP)
AI.com
◧
12. blibbl+4l[view] [source] 2024-01-24 21:48:55
>>sackfi+(OP)
Microsoft Bob 2.0
◧◩◪
13. Sebgue+Ll[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 21:54:49
>>nabaki+52
This has the same energy as Micro$oft.
[go to top]