zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. willma+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-24 15:28:35
You would want to design and test a vectoring nuclear thermal rocket built to absorb neutrons and reduce thrust on one side, and burn 100% on the other side, with the ability to gimbal the thrust vector depending on the asteroid's orientation. This gives you a much bigger margin of error versus "white paint" or conventional rockets imo.

You probably wouldn't want to nuke it, because you risk buck shotting the earth with a cloud of asteroids. Having a vectored nuclear rocket also allows you to change your trajectory if your initial calculations are off.

replies(1): >>willma+9i7
2. willma+9i7[view] [source] 2024-01-26 18:57:19
>>willma+(OP)
The other problem is propellent. I think using the material of the asteroid itself as propellent makes the most sense.
[go to top]