zlacker

> You do copyright for content that you invented and which didn't exist before.

I dont think that's accurate.

The Copyright Act, § 103, allows copyright protection for "compilations (of facts)", as long as there is some "creative" or "original" act involved in developing the compilation, such as in the selection (deciding which facts to include or exclude) and arrangement (how facts are displayed and in what order).

>>lionko+(OP)
Okay. But ChatGPT doesn't spin out the fact in the same order right? So how does this stand in court?

>>rand12+f
as far as I understodd ChatGPT reproduced a word-for-word part of an NYT article(?), but not sure, didnt read the full post yet.