zlacker

[return to "The New York Times is suing OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement"]
1. rand12+P7[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:48:05
>>ssgodd+(OP)
You do copyright for content that you invented and which didn't exist before.

But NYT content is reporting on events truthfully to the public without any fiction or lies.

Since there can be only one truth it should not matter whether NYT or Washington Post or ChatGPT is spinning it out.

Unless NYT is claiming they don't report truth and publishes fiction.

That is of concern since, NYT claims to reporth news truthfully.

So is NYT scamming Americans hundreds of millions of dollars by charging for subscription fees by making a false promise on things that they report?

This should be the bigger question here.

◧◩
2. lionko+M8[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:52:46
>>rand12+P7
> You do copyright for content that you invented and which didn't exist before.

I dont think that's accurate.

The Copyright Act, § 103, allows copyright protection for "compilations (of facts)", as long as there is some "creative" or "original" act involved in developing the compilation, such as in the selection (deciding which facts to include or exclude) and arrangement (how facts are displayed and in what order).

◧◩◪
3. rand12+19[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:54:00
>>lionko+M8
Okay. But ChatGPT doesn't spin out the fact in the same order right? So how does this stand in court?
◧◩◪◨
4. lionko+p9[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:55:59
>>rand12+19
as far as I understodd ChatGPT reproduced a word-for-word part of an NYT article(?), but not sure, didnt read the full post yet.
[go to top]