zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. zozbot+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:21:24
The article mentions that ChatGPT will absolutely parrot back NYTimes article text verbatim. So yes, it's copyright infringement.
replies(1): >>lagnia+w1
◧
2. lagnia+w1[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:30:16
>>zozbot+(OP)
Sections of this statement absolutely parrot back NYTimes article text vebatim depending how you look at it. What's the line? 3 sequential verbatim words? 5? 8?
replies(1): >>noitpm+E3
◧◩
3. noitpm+E3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-27 14:42:25
>>lagnia+w1
We'll find out won't we ;)

You have to imagine these limits are already fairly known within the legal community... If you're accused of copying/republishing my published work there will be some minimal threshold of similarity I would need to prove in order to seek damages.

[go to top]