zlacker

>>ssgodd+(OP)
What are they arguing here? AFAIK reading copyrighted works is not copyright infringement. Copying and selling them is, as the name would suggest, but OpenAI absolutely did not do that. Are they trying to say that LLM training is a special type of reading that should be considered infringement? Seems like a weak case to me.

edit: Would be very funny if OpenAI used an educational fair use defense

>>fallin+E2
The article mentions that ChatGPT will absolutely parrot back NYTimes article text verbatim. So yes, it's copyright infringement.

>>zozbot+c3
Sections of this statement absolutely parrot back NYTimes article text vebatim depending how you look at it. What's the line? 3 sequential verbatim words? 5? 8?

>>lagnia+I4
We'll find out won't we ;)

You have to imagine these limits are already fairly known within the legal community... If you're accused of copying/republishing my published work there will be some minimal threshold of similarity I would need to prove in order to seek damages.