zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. bredre+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:42:23
There's a path back from this disfunction but my sense before this new twist was that the drama had severely impacted OpenAI as an industry leader. The product and talent positioning seemed ahead by years only to get destroyed by unforced errors.

This instability can only mean the industry as a whole will move forward faster. Competitors see the weakness and will push harder.

OpenAI will have a harder time keeping secret sauces from leaking out, and just productivity must be in nose dive.

A terrible mess.

replies(2): >>Vervio+k5 >>dkjaud+L6
2. Vervio+k5[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:59:59
>>bredre+(OP)
Maybe overall better for society, when a single ivory tower doesn’t have a monopoly on AI!
3. dkjaud+L6[view] [source] 2023-11-20 18:05:04
>>bredre+(OP)
> This instability can only mean the industry as a whole will move forward faster.

The hype surrounding OpenAI and the black hole of credibility it created was a problem, it's only positive that it's taken down several notches. Better now than when they have even more (undeserved) influence.

replies(1): >>sebzim+2f
◧◩
4. sebzim+2f[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 18:34:46
>>dkjaud+L6
I think their influence was deserved. They have by far the best model available, and despite constant promises from the rest of the industry no one else has come close.
replies(1): >>dkjaud+q31
◧◩◪
5. dkjaud+q31[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 21:48:17
>>sebzim+2f
That's fine. The "Altman is a genius and we're well on our way to AGI" less so.
[go to top]