zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. nostra+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 16:01:13
Could be a way to get backdoor-acquihired by Microsoft without a diligence process or board approval. Open up what they have accomplished for public consumption; kick off a massive hype cycle; downplay the problems around hallucinations and abuse; negotiate fat new stock grants for everyone at Microsoft at the peak of the hype cycle; and now all the problems related to actually making this a sustainable, legal technology all become Microsoft's. Manufacture a big crisis, time pressure, and a big opportunity so that Microsoft doesn't dig too deeply into the whole business.

This whole weekend feels like a big pageeant to me, and a lot doesn't add up. Also remember that Altman doesn't hold equity in OpenAI, nor does Ilya, and so their way to get a big payout is to get hired rather than acquired.

Then again, both Hanlon's and Occam's razor suggest that pure human stupidity and chaos may be more at fault.

replies(3): >>deelow+E >>Zetoba+K4 >>spacem+Gb
2. deelow+E[view] [source] 2023-11-20 16:04:49
>>nostra+(OP)
This seems really dangerous. What's to stop top talent from simply choosing a different suitor?
replies(2): >>TrapLo+n2 >>nostra+u5
◧◩
3. TrapLo+n2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 16:14:38
>>deelow+E
Allegiance to the Altman/Brockman brand. Showing your alligiance to your general when they defected/ were thrown is how you rank up.
4. Zetoba+K4[view] [source] 2023-11-20 16:27:49
>>nostra+(OP)
OpenAI always was and will be the AI bad bank for Microsoft...
◧◩
5. nostra+u5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 16:31:08
>>deelow+E
Doesn't matter to anyone at OpenAI, only to Microsoft (which doesn't get a vote). If Google or Amazon were to swoop in and say "Hey, let's hire some of these ex-OpenAI folks in the carnage", it just means they get competitive offers and the chance to have an even bigger stock package.
6. spacem+Gb[view] [source] 2023-11-20 16:59:03
>>nostra+(OP)
I can assure you, none of the people at OpenAI are hurting for lack of employment opportunities.
replies(2): >>x0x0+Ks >>treis+DP
◧◩
7. x0x0+Ks[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 17:55:54
>>spacem+Gb
Especially after this weekend.

If I were one of their competitors, I would have called an emergency board meeting re:accelerating burn and proceeded in advance of board approval with sending senior researchers offers to hire them and their preferred 20 employees.

◧◩
8. treis+DP[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 19:19:00
>>spacem+Gb
Which makes it suspicious that they end up at MS 48 hours after being fired.
replies(1): >>93po+2X
◧◩◪
9. 93po+2X[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 19:46:25
>>treis+DP
They work with the team they do because they want to. If they wanted to jump ship for another opportunity they could probably get hired literally anywhere. It makes perfect sense to transition to MS
[go to top]