zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. captai+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 15:06:32
1) It may be possible to brute-force a model into something that sufficiently resembles AGI for most use-cases (at least well enough to merit concern about who controls it) 2) Deep learning has never been terribly scientific, but here we are.
replies(1): >>cactus+Hu
2. cactus+Hu[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:33:31
>>captai+(OP)
If it can’t digest a math textbook and do equations, how would AGI be accomplished? So many problems are advanced mathematics.
replies(1): >>captai+UF
◧◩
3. captai+UF[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 18:13:04
>>cactus+Hu
Right, I do agree that the current LLM paradigm probably won't achieve true AGI; but I think that the current trajectory could produce a powerful enough generalist agent model to seriously put AI ethics to task at pretty much every angle.
[go to top]