zlacker

>>skille+(OP)
Well, great to see that the potentially dangerous future of AGI is in good hands.

>>projec+p8
They will never discover AGI with this approach because 1) they are brute forcing the results and 2) none of this is actually science.

>>cactus+se
1) It may be possible to brute-force a model into something that sufficiently resembles AGI for most use-cases (at least well enough to merit concern about who controls it) 2) Deep learning has never been terribly scientific, but here we are.

>>captai+Em
If it can’t digest a math textbook and do equations, how would AGI be accomplished? So many problems are advanced mathematics.

>>cactus+lR
Right, I do agree that the current LLM paradigm probably won't achieve true AGI; but I think that the current trajectory could produce a powerful enough generalist agent model to seriously put AI ethics to task at pretty much every angle.