zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Boiled+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 11:44:04
Do you have a reference for that? I'd like to read / view it.
replies(1): >>lsicla+P4
2. lsicla+P4[view] [source] 2023-11-20 12:19:57
>>Boiled+(OP)
I believe this is a reference to Emmett’s Sept 16 [1] post on X:

> I specifically say I’m in favor of slowing down, which is sort of like pausing except it’s slowing down.

> If we’re at a speed of 10 right now, a pause is reducing to 0. I think we should aim for a 1-2 instead.

[1] https://x.com/eshear/status/1703178063306203397?s=20

replies(1): >>rvnx+0e
◧◩
3. rvnx+0e[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:17:15
>>lsicla+P4
Quite bad news, imagine a CEO trying to slow down his own company instead of pushing it forward :|
replies(2): >>kcb+Ql >>jacque+R33
◧◩◪
4. kcb+Ql[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:49:49
>>rvnx+0e
It's almost like they live in a vacuum where there's not a nation in particular with essentially infinite resources and smart people like them that will immediately capitalize on these delays.
◧◩◪
5. jacque+R33[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-21 02:53:20
>>rvnx+0e
With the rate employees are ditching they may well see that factor of 10% as some upper bound or a goal to strive for.
[go to top]