zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. xvecto+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 11:07:01
He has already indicated that he intends to slow development by over 90%.
replies(1): >>Boiled+V5
2. Boiled+V5[view] [source] 2023-11-20 11:44:04
>>xvecto+(OP)
Do you have a reference for that? I'd like to read / view it.
replies(1): >>lsicla+Ka
◧◩
3. lsicla+Ka[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:19:57
>>Boiled+V5
I believe this is a reference to Emmett’s Sept 16 [1] post on X:

> I specifically say I’m in favor of slowing down, which is sort of like pausing except it’s slowing down.

> If we’re at a speed of 10 right now, a pause is reducing to 0. I think we should aim for a 1-2 instead.

[1] https://x.com/eshear/status/1703178063306203397?s=20

replies(1): >>rvnx+Vj
◧◩◪
4. rvnx+Vj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:17:15
>>lsicla+Ka
Quite bad news, imagine a CEO trying to slow down his own company instead of pushing it forward :|
replies(2): >>kcb+Lr >>jacque+M93
◧◩◪◨
5. kcb+Lr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:49:49
>>rvnx+Vj
It's almost like they live in a vacuum where there's not a nation in particular with essentially infinite resources and smart people like them that will immediately capitalize on these delays.
◧◩◪◨
6. jacque+M93[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-21 02:53:20
>>rvnx+Vj
With the rate employees are ditching they may well see that factor of 10% as some upper bound or a goal to strive for.
[go to top]