zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. cphoov+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:55:03
"brilliant"

I think "predictable" is more apt.

replies(3): >>divbze+24 >>singul+46 >>sander+PC
2. divbze+24[view] [source] 2023-11-20 09:20:01
>>cphoov+(OP)
It makes perfect sense for Satya, Sam, and Greg, but I doubt many of us thought deeply enough to have predicted it in advance.
3. singul+46[view] [source] 2023-11-20 09:31:30
>>cphoov+(OP)
link to your prediction?
replies(1): >>boring+5A
◧◩
4. boring+5A[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:53:30
>>singul+46
I mean there weren't a lot of options.
replies(1): >>sander+5D
5. sander+PC[view] [source] 2023-11-20 13:09:51
>>cphoov+(OP)
I've read a decent amount of predictions about this and had not actually seen this one or considered it until I read about it happening.

I think the predictable thing would have been a new company with new investment from Microsoft. But this is better; it a bit like magical thinking that MS would want to just throw more money after a new venture and essentially write off the old one. This solution accomplished similar things, but gives more to Microsoft in the trade by bringing that "new company" fully in house.

◧◩◪
6. sander+5D[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:11:27
>>boring+5A
Yes but I didn't see this one discussed at all. Did you? Curious to see those threads if you have links. I might have just missed them.
[go to top]