zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. quiett+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:21:14
This. Very accurate. At the end of they day this is a battle between academics and capitalists and what they stand for. We generally know how this typically goes…
replies(2): >>irrati+e1 >>simsey+z2
2. irrati+e1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:30:07
>>quiett+(OP)
The capitalists run it into the ground while the academics stand around confused asking each other what happened?
3. simsey+z2[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:39:35
>>quiett+(OP)
I don't see many academics indulge in sensationalist doomsaying. That's the real difference here. SETI wouldn't and couldn't seek grants by proposing to contact murderous aliens.

I think academics have a general faith in goodwill of intelligence.Benevolence may be a convergent phenomenon. Maybe the mechanisms of reason themselves require empathy and goodness

replies(1): >>sudosy+03
◧◩
4. sudosy+03[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 07:42:48
>>simsey+z2
Huh? There's plenty of AI doomerism amongst academics, see Bengio, Hinton, etc...
replies(1): >>simsey+o6
◧◩◪
5. simsey+o6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 08:02:28
>>sudosy+03
Hinton makes cliched statements as if he's not given much thought to safety but feels obliged for whatever reason
[go to top]