zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. _fizz_+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:18:47
Totally agree. It seems like OpenAI is ahead of the curve, but even some free open source projects have become really good. I am no expert, so take this with a grain of salt. It seems OpenAI has a lead, but only of a few months or so and others are racing behind. I guess it really sucks if you built something that relies on the OpenAI api, but even then one could replace the api layer.
replies(3): >>Comple+f1 >>huyter+E1 >>Occams+N9
2. Comple+f1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:26:52
>>_fizz_+(OP)
For coding, at least, nothing out there is even close to as good as GPT-4. Not Claude, not Grok, and certainly not llama.
replies(1): >>hobofa+L3
3. huyter+E1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 07:29:53
>>_fizz_+(OP)
None of the open source stuff even comes close to GPT4, I’ve tried them repeatedly.
◧◩
4. hobofa+L3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 07:44:34
>>Comple+f1
For coding tasks (without API access), especially in a conversational setting, Phind has been by far the best one for me. I sometimes still compare it to ChatGPT with GPT-4, but it almost always comes out on top (not missing the point of the questions + amount of required editing for integration into codebase), and it does produce the answers a lot faster.
5. Occams+N9[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:13:50
>>_fizz_+(OP)
I mean, OpenAI aren't just going to close up shop. I would very much doubt they're just going to turn off their APIs. I would just keep building and if you have to swap LLMs at some point then do so.
replies(1): >>laurel+cm
◧◩
6. laurel+cm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 09:15:03
>>Occams+N9
That’s my fear is that they will phase out Plus subscriptions and shut down APIs because the folks that will be left want nothing to do with product.
[go to top]