zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. EMIREL+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:44:11
How would you have done it?
replies(2): >>peyton+E >>colmvp+H
◧
2. peyton+E[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:50:22
>>EMIREL+(OP)
Done what? A competent board would not do this.
replies(1): >>EMIREL+53
◧
3. colmvp+H[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:50:57
>>EMIREL+(OP)
To be frank, isn't it weird to appoint an interim CEO who sides with the person you ousted? Why not have appointed someone more sympathetic to your position?
◧◩
4. EMIREL+53[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 05:10:07
>>peyton+E
Suppose there's an unfixable conflict of interest/vision between Altman and the board, what would you have done if you were in the board's shoes?
[go to top]