zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. peyton+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:43:21
Complete clown show by Ilya, Helen, Adam, and Tasha.
replies(3): >>EMIREL+4 >>fatbir+C >>voidfu+D
2. EMIREL+4[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:44:11
>>peyton+(OP)
How would you have done it?
replies(2): >>peyton+I >>colmvp+L
3. fatbir+C[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:49:03
>>peyton+(OP)
You're assuming this story is legit. Anonymous sources have been all over the place, seeding the idea that that Sam will return; the board hasn't responded. Maybe it's as big a mess on the board's side as you say. Maybe Sam's supporters are trying to create a dominant narrative that becomes self-fulfilling.
replies(1): >>peyton+N
4. voidfu+D[view] [source] 2023-11-20 04:49:39
>>peyton+(OP)
They're going to be helming a ghost company soon. Good job; great effort.

They're never going to get the funding they need after this clown show. Nobody is going to give them $$$ without seriously restructuring the board.

◧◩
5. peyton+I[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 04:50:22
>>EMIREL+4
Done what? A competent board would not do this.
replies(1): >>EMIREL+93
◧◩
6. colmvp+L[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 04:50:57
>>EMIREL+4
To be frank, isn't it weird to appoint an interim CEO who sides with the person you ousted? Why not have appointed someone more sympathetic to your position?
◧◩
7. peyton+N[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 04:51:19
>>fatbir+C
I’m not assuming anything. It’s been a clown show since the press release smearing the outgoing executive.
replies(2): >>fatbir+52 >>dang+U2
◧◩◪
8. fatbir+52[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 05:00:52
>>peyton+N
You're assuming the smears aren't deserved :)

More anonymous voices have pointed out that Sam was effectively laying the groundwork for one or two more AI startups based on the work OpenAI was doing, without informing the board, and in contravention of the way OpenAI was deliberately structured to restrain unfettered AI profit-seeking. But again, anonymous voices. And in the background, Sam's sister making very dire accusations against him.

There's a whole lot of smoke, but I have no clue where the fire is, and I'm sceptical of everyone now, especially Sam Altman because his image is so shiny that it feels like a professional effort.

◧◩◪
9. dang+U2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 05:08:10
>>peyton+N
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

You've been on HN for many years and we're certainly glad to have you - we just need comments to be more thoughtful/substantive and a little less reactive. I hope that makes sense.

◧◩◪
10. EMIREL+93[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 05:10:07
>>peyton+I
Suppose there's an unfixable conflict of interest/vision between Altman and the board, what would you have done if you were in the board's shoes?
[go to top]