zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Simon_+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 21:09:56
That's the choice isn't it. Either reinstall Sam Altman and sack the board, or move the funding to whatever entity he goes and sets up next.
replies(2): >>static+C4 >>sdento+6d
2. static+C4[view] [source] 2023-11-19 21:33:22
>>Simon_+(OP)
I've seen people say this but why would Microsoft fund a new Altman startup instead of spending that money on developing their own AI owned by Microsoft?
replies(2): >>siva7+me >>tstrim+KS
3. sdento+6d[view] [source] 2023-11-19 22:12:46
>>Simon_+(OP)
Or set off a new bidding war for both the researchers that quit and the pile of new startups... There's no rule that stays M$ would have to be the only bidder for the new venture(s).
◧◩
4. siva7+me[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 22:18:17
>>static+C4
Like Google did?
replies(1): >>static+8j
◧◩◪
5. static+8j[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 22:41:55
>>siva7+me
Google is at best only partially funding Anthropic, Amazon committed "up to 4 billion" in funding. They have their own competing technology in development.
◧◩
6. tstrim+KS[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 02:29:36
>>static+C4
The moat isn’t very deep or wide here. It does exist, but most FAANG (including Microsoft) should be able to overcome it with the right investments. Microsoft is probably best positioned to leverage this tech with the integration they have been pursuing across most of their products. They have probably mage better use of “OpenAI” than any other company and are in the best position to replace them.
[go to top]