zlacker

We don't know any of that. Only things we know are statement from the board and statement from Altman that he was caught by surprise and statement from Microsoft they're supporting new CEO and few of the people that left. That's all we know for sure. Everything else are rumors and PR spins for now. If they have some evidence of what they said in statement about lying we just don't know.

>>Keyfra+(OP)
The board can easily back up their public claim. They don't.

Even the email to their own employees says it is a irreconcilable difference. Nothing about lying.

I don't think it is reasonable to go with "we don't know". It is more like: "it is crucial to back up your claim. Still, you don't.".

>>ergoco+mW
I don't disagree. It's just maybe they have something they haven't shared or maybe they don't. We don't know (yet).

>>Keyfra+f02
The fact that they didn't follow up with evidence immediately shows that they are incompetent.

You don't just accuse someone of committing a heinous crime and stay silent. What is the detail?

>>ergoco+rJ2
True, but are they obliged to provide all details to the public?

>>Keyfra+c23
No, but they are also not obliged to accuse Sam of lying either. But here we are.

You think accusing someone of lying in a public statement and don't follow up is competent?

>>ergoco+nu3
I agree with you