zlacker

>>medler+(OP)
If the reports are true, and Ilya led the coup, then either him or Sam can be at OpenAI going forward but not both. The rest of the board members who sided with him are gone either way.

Regardless of who ends up at the helm, OpenAI is going to be a different place on Monday than it was on Thursday, and not for the better.

>>woeiru+Hd
Not for the better why?

Obviously Sam wasn’t the best fit for OpenAI and investors aren’t even saying what the problem is. Clearly the board feels he was the wrong person for the job.

I think it’s ridiculous that everything thinks that Sam being outed means OpenAI is in trouble. Let this play out and see how it evolves

>>no_wiz+ng
They accused Sam of lying in a public statement when they don't have an evidence to back it up.

Those 4 people are not fit to run any company.

Not a single person asked: well hey what if somebody asks for an evidence of lying? Do we have one?

>>ergoco+6J
We don't know any of that. Only things we know are statement from the board and statement from Altman that he was caught by surprise and statement from Microsoft they're supporting new CEO and few of the people that left. That's all we know for sure. Everything else are rumors and PR spins for now. If they have some evidence of what they said in statement about lying we just don't know.

>>Keyfra+YY
The board can easily back up their public claim. They don't.

Even the email to their own employees says it is a irreconcilable difference. Nothing about lying.

I don't think it is reasonable to go with "we don't know". It is more like: "it is crucial to back up your claim. Still, you don't.".

>>ergoco+kV1
I don't disagree. It's just maybe they have something they haven't shared or maybe they don't. We don't know (yet).

>>Keyfra+dZ2
The fact that they didn't follow up with evidence immediately shows that they are incompetent.

You don't just accuse someone of committing a heinous crime and stay silent. What is the detail?