zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. x86x87+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:14:43
one thing that I am curious about: aren't there non-competes in place here? and even without them, you just cannot start your own thing that just replicates what your previous employer does - this has lawsuit written all over it.
replies(3): >>quotie+9 >>karmas+w >>sangno+b7
2. quotie+9[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:16:38
>>x86x87+(OP)
It's California. Non-competes are void. It is one of the few states where non-competes are not legally enforceable.
3. karmas+w[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:20:30
>>x86x87+(OP)
Nah this is California, that won’t work
4. sangno+b7[view] [source] 2023-11-19 04:03:57
>>x86x87+(OP)
It'll be tough going with no Azure compute contracts, no GPUs, no billions from Microsoft, no training data, OpenAI capturing all of the value from user-generated content resulted in sites like Reddit and Twitter significantly raising the cost to scrape them.
replies(1): >>dabock+yd
◧◩
5. dabock+yd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 04:56:08
>>sangno+b7
The same thing got said about Elon Musk and Twitter, and yet X is still somehow alive.
replies(2): >>edgyqu+Nh >>ivalm+8C
◧◩◪
6. edgyqu+Nh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 05:33:25
>>dabock+yd
No nothing similar at all was said about that. Sam Altman is also not Elon Musk
replies(1): >>wesley+Vl
◧◩◪◨
7. wesley+Vl[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 06:18:11
>>edgyqu+Nh
Yeah, Sam will not turn 40billion into 0 billion
◧◩◪
8. ivalm+8C[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 09:07:23
>>dabock+yd
Elon had a massive preexisting AI-compute capacity from Tesla and ann enormous training set from X. That’s very different.
[go to top]