zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. Animat+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 02:33:01
"Missing a key 5PM PT deadline by which many OpenAI staffers were set to resign."

Says who? And did they resign?

replies(1): >>x86x87+C6
2. x86x87+C6[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:14:43
>>Animat+(OP)
one thing that I am curious about: aren't there non-competes in place here? and even without them, you just cannot start your own thing that just replicates what your previous employer does - this has lawsuit written all over it.
replies(3): >>quotie+L6 >>karmas+87 >>sangno+Nd
◧◩
3. quotie+L6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 03:16:38
>>x86x87+C6
It's California. Non-competes are void. It is one of the few states where non-competes are not legally enforceable.
◧◩
4. karmas+87[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 03:20:30
>>x86x87+C6
Nah this is California, that won’t work
◧◩
5. sangno+Nd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 04:03:57
>>x86x87+C6
It'll be tough going with no Azure compute contracts, no GPUs, no billions from Microsoft, no training data, OpenAI capturing all of the value from user-generated content resulted in sites like Reddit and Twitter significantly raising the cost to scrape them.
replies(1): >>dabock+ak
◧◩◪
6. dabock+ak[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 04:56:08
>>sangno+Nd
The same thing got said about Elon Musk and Twitter, and yet X is still somehow alive.
replies(2): >>edgyqu+po >>ivalm+KI
◧◩◪◨
7. edgyqu+po[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 05:33:25
>>dabock+ak
No nothing similar at all was said about that. Sam Altman is also not Elon Musk
replies(1): >>wesley+xs
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. wesley+xs[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 06:18:11
>>edgyqu+po
Yeah, Sam will not turn 40billion into 0 billion
◧◩◪◨
9. ivalm+KI[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 09:07:23
>>dabock+ak
Elon had a massive preexisting AI-compute capacity from Tesla and ann enormous training set from X. That’s very different.
[go to top]