zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. svnt+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:03:29
It was funny because with the Clooneys both of them have actually accomplished things in significant situations and it was clearly wrong.

In this case this person seems to have primarily tried and failed to spin a robotics company out of Singularity “university” in 2012.

This only sounds adjacent to AI if you work in Hollywood.

replies(1): >>ivan_g+ob1
2. ivan_g+ob1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 11:33:54
>>svnt+(OP)
It was wrong not because they both did achieve something. It is generally wrong and the joke just used their achievements to break the barrier for understanding that.
replies(1): >>svnt+Gj2
◧◩
3. svnt+Gj2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 18:33:01
>>ivan_g+ob1
Suggesting that we should be on a first name basis with the romantic partner of every famous person we know of simply because they are the romantic partner of a famous person is pretty naive. “Spouse of Y” works just fine generally to save space and effort for (locally) real people.
[go to top]