zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. insani+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:27:33
Easy to say, but when you looked at your option prices I bet you'd be second guessing that.

edit: You have edited your post radically to say different hings like 5x now, I can not keep up.

replies(2): >>refulg+9 >>no_wiz+Bw
2. refulg+9[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:29:09
>>insani+(OP)
All the more reason to nip it in the bud. The explicit main goal was _not_ to be a gravy train, and it got co-opted for one.
replies(1): >>insani+y
◧◩
3. insani+y[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:31:11
>>refulg+9
I'm sure that tanking your company to avoid profit will be a great winning strategy, I look forward to your startup journey.
replies(1): >>refulg+52
◧◩◪
4. refulg+52[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:40:51
>>insani+y
Strawman
replies(1): >>insani+82
◧◩◪◨
5. insani+82[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:41:37
>>refulg+52
You: "The goal of the company is to not make money"

Me: "Good luck with that terrible strategy"

Not a straw man.

replies(2): >>anonca+34 >>refulg+p72
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. anonca+34[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:53:17
>>insani+82
Yeah, you can tell by the fact you had to make up the quote wholesale, not even word swaps or anything clever
7. no_wiz+Bw[view] [source] 2023-11-19 04:03:24
>>insani+(OP)
It’s a private company, options are nothing until otherwise anyway, in most cases. I wouldn’t look at them very much either way and I hope they’re smart enough to make the same distinction
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. refulg+p72[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 17:19:58
>>insani+82
Straw-ception!
[go to top]