zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. refulg+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:26:51
If I were at OpenAI I'd be pissed strangers concern-trolled for me, all while my position was obvious given the company I joined: Open AI.
replies(1): >>insani+7
2. insani+7[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:27:33
>>refulg+(OP)
Easy to say, but when you looked at your option prices I bet you'd be second guessing that.

edit: You have edited your post radically to say different hings like 5x now, I can not keep up.

replies(2): >>refulg+g >>no_wiz+Iw
◧◩
3. refulg+g[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:29:09
>>insani+7
All the more reason to nip it in the bud. The explicit main goal was _not_ to be a gravy train, and it got co-opted for one.
replies(1): >>insani+F
◧◩◪
4. insani+F[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:31:11
>>refulg+g
I'm sure that tanking your company to avoid profit will be a great winning strategy, I look forward to your startup journey.
replies(1): >>refulg+c2
◧◩◪◨
5. refulg+c2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:40:51
>>insani+F
Strawman
replies(1): >>insani+f2
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. insani+f2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:41:37
>>refulg+c2
You: "The goal of the company is to not make money"

Me: "Good luck with that terrible strategy"

Not a straw man.

replies(2): >>anonca+a4 >>refulg+w72
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. anonca+a4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:53:17
>>insani+f2
Yeah, you can tell by the fact you had to make up the quote wholesale, not even word swaps or anything clever
◧◩
8. no_wiz+Iw[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 04:03:24
>>insani+7
It’s a private company, options are nothing until otherwise anyway, in most cases. I wouldn’t look at them very much either way and I hope they’re smart enough to make the same distinction
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
9. refulg+w72[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 17:19:58
>>insani+f2
Straw-ception!
[go to top]