zlacker

GPT is based on research Google published, it’s not like he’s the Einstein of AI. Shenanigans like this can absolutely derail your future regardless of how talented you may be.

>>speedy+(OP)
There's not many Einsteins of anything besides Einstein himself. That doesn't change the fact that he is widely considered in the field to be a top expert and has shown that he can lead the development of a wildly successful product.

If this does end up being a failed coup, then it is of course detrimental to his career. But the statement I'm replying to was explicitly saying he would never work in tech again. Do you honestly believe there is any chance that Sutskever would be unable to work in this field somewhere else if he ultimately leaves OpenAI for whatever reason? I would bet $10,000 that he would have big name companies knocking on his door within days.

>>cthalu+V1
days? before he walks out the door. he must already have permanently open doors for him if he wants.

can he work on what he wants in those places? that is another story of course. but he knows the ins and outs of the lightning in a jar they captured and arguably that is the most promising asset on planet earth right now, so he'll be fine.

>>cthalu+V1
Maybe not as extreme as never being able to find work again, but I doubt he’ll ever find himself in an important role where he’s able to lead and make consequential decisions. He basically clipped his own wings to put it metaphorically, if this is indeed a failed coup that was lead by him.

>>speedy+(OP)
> GPT is based on research Google published

Why didnt Google create ChatGpt then, why did the fall behind?

>>speedy+(OP)
Yet he managed to create versions of it that work better than what Google itself could make.

>>sumedh+hl
Everything's obvious once you know all the answers.

Google is publishing a lot of research and I guess many of them will be used by other companies.

Do you know now which research will be the basis of tomorrow's most spoken tech? No. They don't either.

>>jnwats+sF
Well, he was hired away from Google in the first place.

>>speedy+V4
Do you think if he starts a company no one will follow him?

>>Gigabl+JJ
Years ago. And Google has been working actively on AI since that time, and even more actively since GPT-3.5 was released and they realized they need to catch up.

They are still catching up. What does this tell us?

>>Davidz+AR
Those on his team at OpenAI probably would yeah and anyone who shares views on AI safety. But the real question is will he able to raise capitol?

>>whynot+KF
> Everything's obvious once you know all the answers.

No not really, Google has a history of not delivering or launching half baked products and then killing them quickly.

>>sumedh+211
Read this sentence as "it's easy to say something is successful once it reached success".

>>whynot+qD1
Did you miss the history part?

Dont worry Google will launch a new version of a Chat App with AI to fix all their previous failures