zlacker

>>medler+(OP)
I don’t understand why and how they didn’t consider this sort of discussion before so unceremoniously firing him. The others on the board outside Ilya need to go.

I don’t consider anybody beyond forgiveness and if Ilya takes a professional lesson from this and Sam learns to be more mindful of others’ concerns, I consider this a win for all. Starting over in a new entity sounds great but would be years of setback.

I hope they work this out.

>>dereg+21
Why do you not think Ilya was the cheif architect of this failed coup? Im being serious everything ive seen points to him being the one responsible, there is no way he will ever stay let alone work in tech again

>>kelsey+O8
You are absolutely delusional if you think the man who oversaw the development of GPT would not be able to continue working in tech even if he orchestrated a failed coup.

>>cthalu+X9
GPT is based on research Google published, it’s not like he’s the Einstein of AI. Shenanigans like this can absolutely derail your future regardless of how talented you may be.

>>speedy+Sb
> GPT is based on research Google published

Why didnt Google create ChatGpt then, why did the fall behind?

>>sumedh+9x
Everything's obvious once you know all the answers.

Google is publishing a lot of research and I guess many of them will be used by other companies.

Do you know now which research will be the basis of tomorrow's most spoken tech? No. They don't either.

>>whynot+CR
> Everything's obvious once you know all the answers.

No not really, Google has a history of not delivering or launching half baked products and then killing them quickly.

>>sumedh+Uc1
Read this sentence as "it's easy to say something is successful once it reached success".

>>whynot+iP1
Did you miss the history part?

Dont worry Google will launch a new version of a Chat App with AI to fix all their previous failures