zlacker

You don't know why Altman was fired in the first place

Maybe their intentions where right and know MS forces them to take them back.

In the end will get a company working for MS's benefit only.

>>croes+(OP)
My point is that the reason for Sam's firing is irrelevant to the point that the board is incompetent and should be fired.

Valid or not, you don't blindside major investors who have given you billions. They apparently told Microsoft minutes before the announcement and after the decision had already been made. Even if you fully intend to take this course of action, you loop in your major investors and consult them or at least give them a heads up to prepare any communications they might need to make or even just their press people are prepared for the inevitable questions.

They didn't do that, according to Micrsoft. That's why they need to be fired.

>>jmyeet+Z
What if MS and Altman planned a coup to get rid of the non profit part?

And MS isn't an investor in the company of the board.