zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. consum+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 22:55:41
And then rename it ProfitAI, so as to satisfy all of the "Open" nay-sayers?
replies(1): >>wilg+p
2. wilg+p[view] [source] 2023-11-18 22:57:36
>>consum+(OP)
Just call it "Foundation".
replies(2): >>consum+F1 >>srwsfr+Ye
◧◩
3. consum+F1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:03:13
>>wilg+p
In all seriousness, FoundationAI sounds pretty good.

For lack there of, PsychohistoryAI it is!

RIP: AlignmentAI

replies(1): >>wilg+c2
◧◩◪
4. wilg+c2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:05:38
>>consum+F1
Drop the "AI", it's cleaner.
replies(1): >>consum+53
◧◩◪◨
5. consum+53[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:08:33
>>wilg+c2
Agreed, but how will the investor class understand what to invest in?

Oh, I get it now, Foundation.ai

replies(1): >>wilg+n4
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. wilg+n4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:14:58
>>consum+53
that's what sama is for
replies(1): >>consum+i5
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. consum+i5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:18:27
>>wilg+n4
Yeah. You are correct.

Would love some commercial fusion power plants on the side as well please.

◧◩
8. srwsfr+Ye[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:06:24
>>wilg+p
AI-Qaeda
replies(1): >>Vecr+rL1
◧◩◪
9. Vecr+rL1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 13:17:02
>>srwsfr+Ye
https://thebase.ai
[go to top]