zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. aidama+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:38:03
you're right. agi has been here since GPT-3 at the least.

it's honestly sad when people who have clearly not use gpt4 would call it a parroting machine. that is incredibly ignorant.

replies(1): >>ric2b+ya
2. ric2b+ya[view] [source] 2023-11-18 11:08:20
>>aidama+(OP)
Let me know when GPT can even play chess without making invalid moves, then we can talk about how capable it is of logical thinking.
replies(1): >>kliber+iX
◧◩
3. kliber+iX[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 16:16:05
>>ric2b+ya
Let me know when you can prove that "logical" and "intelligent" were ever stored on the same shelf, much less being meaningfully equivalent. If anything, we know that making a general intelligence (the only natural example of it we know) emulate logic is crazily inefficient and susceptive to biases that are entirely non-existent (save for bugs) in much simpler (and energy-efficient) implementations of said logic.
replies(1): >>ric2b+7u1
◧◩◪
4. ric2b+7u1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 19:05:44
>>kliber+iX
An AGI that can't even play a game of chess, a game that children learn to play, without making an invalid move doesn't really sound like an AGI.
[go to top]