zlacker

No, we are not close to AGI. And AGIs can't leave machines yet, so humans will still be humans. This paranoia about a parroting machine is unwarranted.

>>csomar+(OP)
you're right. agi has been here since GPT-3 at the least.

it's honestly sad when people who have clearly not use gpt4 would call it a parroting machine. that is incredibly ignorant.

>>aidama+bi
Let me know when GPT can even play chess without making invalid moves, then we can talk about how capable it is of logical thinking.

>>ric2b+Js
Let me know when you can prove that "logical" and "intelligent" were ever stored on the same shelf, much less being meaningfully equivalent. If anything, we know that making a general intelligence (the only natural example of it we know) emulate logic is crazily inefficient and susceptive to biases that are entirely non-existent (save for bugs) in much simpler (and energy-efficient) implementations of said logic.

>>kliber+tf1
An AGI that can't even play a game of chess, a game that children learn to play, without making an invalid move doesn't really sound like an AGI.