zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. miohta+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:22:23
The world needs more truly open source AI models where the success and outcomes do not depend on a single figurehead or a corporation.
replies(2): >>philov+m3 >>Feepin+bc
2. philov+m3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:55:08
>>miohta+(OP)
Who grey-texted this comment? So confused who could disagree with it. Is that the problem, this comment is so obviously true, it's just redundant?
replies(1): >>konsch+W3
◧◩
3. konsch+W3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 09:59:16
>>philov+m3
The problem is that you cannot finance the training of a competitive AI model and then turn around and give it all away for free.

Who's supposed to pay for that?

replies(3): >>miohta+L4 >>joachi+T8 >>wildrh+Ad
◧◩◪
4. miohta+L4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 10:06:18
>>konsch+W3
Open and paid are not mutually exclusive. Someone is paying for Linux kernel development as well.
◧◩◪
5. joachi+T8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 10:37:45
>>konsch+W3
Universities usually do that, they work on open problems and publish their findings for free.
replies(1): >>konsch+xa1
6. Feepin+bc[view] [source] 2023-11-18 11:07:52
>>miohta+(OP)
The truth or falsity of this statement turns entirely on whether more AI is good or not. You are in agreement with doomers that single figureheads are a weakpoint. That's the point. The disagreement is on whether having massive uncontrollable power widely dispersed is beneficial.
◧◩◪
7. wildrh+Ad[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 11:18:19
>>konsch+W3
Good lord, is this the 'hacker' mindset now?
◧◩◪◨
8. konsch+xa1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 17:14:58
>>joachi+T8
Since there is enough private investment available, why spend public money?
[go to top]