zlacker

2024 for OpenAI is looking bleak.

>>xyst+(OP)
The world needs more truly open source AI models where the success and outcomes do not depend on a single figurehead or a corporation.

>>miohta+0c
Who grey-texted this comment? So confused who could disagree with it. Is that the problem, this comment is so obviously true, it's just redundant?

>>philov+mf
The problem is that you cannot finance the training of a competitive AI model and then turn around and give it all away for free.

Who's supposed to pay for that?

>>konsch+Wf
Open and paid are not mutually exclusive. Someone is paying for Linux kernel development as well.

>>konsch+Wf
Universities usually do that, they work on open problems and publish their findings for free.

>>miohta+0c
The truth or falsity of this statement turns entirely on whether more AI is good or not. You are in agreement with doomers that single figureheads are a weakpoint. That's the point. The disagreement is on whether having massive uncontrollable power widely dispersed is beneficial.

>>konsch+Wf
Good lord, is this the 'hacker' mindset now?

>>joachi+Tk
Since there is enough private investment available, why spend public money?