zlacker

Some weeks ago, I listened to a Bloomberg interview with Altman where he was joined by someone from OpenAI who does the programming. There was obvious disagreement between the two, and the interviewer actually made a joke about it. Perhaps Altman was destined to become the next SBF. Too much misrepresentation to the public, telling people what they want to hear..

>>1vuio0+(OP)
Can you please try to recall and link to the interview? I'd love to see it.

>>mi3law+e6
I listened to that and I'm pretty sure it was this [0] interview with the WSJ, Altman, and Mira Murati. If I'm wrong about that, well, it's still of interest given Mira Murati just took over running OpenAI.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byYlC2cagLw

>>1vuio0+(OP)
what is the disagreement

>>mi3law+e6
@justin66 is correct. It was WSJ Tech Live, not Bloomberg. What I was referring to happens at 7:32 in the video.

Altman answers questions like he is a ChatGPT. Freedom to bullshit.

>>1vuio0+Jf2
I watched that clipped and you're wrong it's a completely normal interaction. Murati says "we're always working on the next thing" and Altman jokes "haha that's such a diplomatic answer" and the interviewer is like "who paired these two?". It's just standard humor.

>>lfmuno+lE1
Altman reacts the how Murati answers a question, implicitly suggesting he might have answered it differently. He could have just kept quiet. Whether this is significant is left as a question for the observer, however, in addition to me, the interviewer noticed it and felt the need to comment.

Personally, in this interview I sensed a disconnect between Altman and Murati, possibly others working at OpenAI. Usually Altman is by himself in these interviews; there's no one else from OpenAI. It led me to suspect Altman was telling interviewers what they wanted to hear.

>>justin+rN
Yeah, that seems like a very normal interaction.