zlacker

Could you elaborate on what you mean by that/why you think so?

>>zbentl+(OP)
Because there is nothing even approaching the claimed risk of "AI", and they're stifling the growth and potential that LLMs have at vastly improving our lives.

>>zbentl+(OP)
AI x-risk is a load of hogwash based on extremely faulty reasoning ill-adapted to real ML architectures and political/economic reality. There is absolutely no reason to worry about the deceptive turn of a paperclip maximizer. Yet because of these sci-fi trope fears, real human progress is being held back.

>>zbentl+(OP)
It is much ado about nothing, to quote our laudet poet in the English canon. Who gives a shit about AI, really?