zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. lazzla+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:28:33
The AI safety people may be one of the most destructive forces in tech history.
replies(2): >>zbentl+A9 >>satvik+5l
◧
2. zbentl+A9[view] [source] 2023-11-18 05:35:56
>>lazzla+(OP)
Could you elaborate on what you mean by that/why you think so?
replies(3): >>WendyT+nh >>adastr+Ej >>satvik+dl
◧◩
3. WendyT+nh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:44:41
>>zbentl+A9
Because there is nothing even approaching the claimed risk of "AI", and they're stifling the growth and potential that LLMs have at vastly improving our lives.
◧◩
4. adastr+Ej[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 07:05:46
>>zbentl+A9
AI x-risk is a load of hogwash based on extremely faulty reasoning ill-adapted to real ML architectures and political/economic reality. There is absolutely no reason to worry about the deceptive turn of a paperclip maximizer. Yet because of these sci-fi trope fears, real human progress is being held back.
◧
5. satvik+5l[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:19:37
>>lazzla+(OP)
I agree, let me query what I wish from the AI; it is literally no different from current search engines.
◧◩
6. satvik+dl[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 07:20:49
>>zbentl+A9
It is much ado about nothing, to quote our laudet poet in the English canon. Who gives a shit about AI, really?
[go to top]