zlacker

the theory that Altman did something in bad faith means that it might not be a disagreement but it's something that forced Sutskever to vote against Sam

>>jeron+(OP)
The theory is Altman gave his eye scanning crypto company early access to openAI tech without telling anyone and what ensued is just FAFO in action.

>>during+V
That’s not big enough to immediately terminate him.

>>woeiru+63
Self-dealing like that really is, not saying I see any reason to suspect its that and not something else, but, yeah, doing that and cocncealing it absolutely would be a reason for both firing him and making the statement made.

Unless Brockman was involved, though, firing Brockman doesn't really make sense.

>>during+V
No way, no Sam - crypto scandal again.

>>dragon+A5
Yeah, looking at the self-dealing going on with WeWork and Adam Neumann, it's not that.

>>fragme+h8
The board knew and agreed to it in that case.

>>fragme+h8
Not sure what you mean here. They tried to IPO in 2019 and all the dirty laundry came out, scuttled the IPO and Neumann got ousted.

>>fragme+h8
There's a difference between self-dealing you sell the board on and self-dealing you conceal from the board (also, different where its a pure for-profit where the self-dealing happens and where there is a non-profit involved, because the latter not only raises issues of conflict of interest with the firm, but also potential violations of the rules governing non-profits.)

>>during+V
I'm also inclined to believe something like this happened.

>>ssnist+9c
Ousted to the tune of millions and millions of dollars tho. Yeah he didn't get an IPO pop, but he's still worth more than you or I could make in several lifetime.