zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. dragon+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:18:30
Well, yeah, he wouldn't be allowed to participate in deliberation about his own removal.
replies(2): >>DavidS+a >>branwe+73
2. DavidS+a[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:19:24
>>dragon+(OP)
Maybe, but there's a difference between not being in the deliberation, and not being notified until the entire planet was.
3. branwe+73[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:31:12
>>dragon+(OP)
wait...isn't "the decision" referred to in the parent comment about the removal of Altman?
replies(2): >>dragon+54 >>bbreie+g4
◧◩
4. dragon+54[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:35:41
>>branwe+73
He was renoved as Chairman at the same time (close enough that they were announced together, and presumably linked in cause, though possibly a separate vote) as Altman was removed as CEO.
replies(1): >>branwe+o7
◧◩
5. bbreie+g4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:36:18
>>branwe+73
Greg's removal was announced in the same press release as Altman's
replies(1): >>branwe+M7
◧◩◪
6. branwe+o7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:52:33
>>dragon+54
ah ok makes sense. I thought he just resigned in response to Altman's ouster, so there was no board decision to remove Brockman.
◧◩◪
7. branwe+M7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:54:22
>>bbreie+g4
ah ok. I thought the board decided to remove Altman, then Brockman quit in response, so there was no deliberation about his (Brockman's) removal.
[go to top]