zlacker

>>nickru+(OP)
This suggests that Greg Brockman wasn't in the board meeting that made the decision, and only "learned the news" that he was off the board the same way the rest of us did.

>>DavidS+d1
Well, yeah, he wouldn't be allowed to participate in deliberation about his own removal.

>>dragon+V1
wait...isn't "the decision" referred to in the parent comment about the removal of Altman?

>>branwe+25
He was renoved as Chairman at the same time (close enough that they were announced together, and presumably linked in cause, though possibly a separate vote) as Altman was removed as CEO.

>>dragon+06
ah ok makes sense. I thought he just resigned in response to Altman's ouster, so there was no board decision to remove Brockman.