zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. dnissl+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:17:52
Presumably Sam recused himself so not necessarily
replies(2): >>babl-y+71 >>SkyPun+w6
2. babl-y+71[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:22:40
>>dnissl+(OP)
Why would he recuse himself? Sam seemed happy to work at OpenAI.

FWIW, radio silence from Ilya on twitter https://twitter.com/ilyasut

replies(3): >>dragon+q2 >>favori+Y2 >>hnaray+PQ
◧◩
3. dragon+q2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:28:23
>>babl-y+71
> Why would he recuse himself?

Usually mandatory for decisions about a board member for them to be recused. That there is an overwhelming potential for conflict between personal interest and the firm’s is pretty clear in that case.

◧◩
4. favori+Y2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:30:29
>>babl-y+71
Because it's a conflict of interest - a CEO should absolutely recuse themselves from a vote on whether they should be removed. If a CEO refused to do so, the board should adjourn and reconvene without the CEO present.
5. SkyPun+w6[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:47:40
>>dnissl+(OP)
Given he was the subject of the vote, he likely wouldn’t even be able to participate.
◧◩
6. hnaray+PQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:16:25
>>babl-y+71
Do you mean X?
[go to top]