zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. babl-y+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:16:32
So given that there are 6 board members, Ilya had to have voted to oust Sam?
replies(1): >>dnissl+e
2. dnissl+e[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:17:52
>>babl-y+(OP)
Presumably Sam recused himself so not necessarily
replies(2): >>babl-y+l1 >>SkyPun+K6
◧◩
3. babl-y+l1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:22:40
>>dnissl+e
Why would he recuse himself? Sam seemed happy to work at OpenAI.

FWIW, radio silence from Ilya on twitter https://twitter.com/ilyasut

replies(3): >>dragon+E2 >>favori+c3 >>hnaray+3R
◧◩◪
4. dragon+E2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:28:23
>>babl-y+l1
> Why would he recuse himself?

Usually mandatory for decisions about a board member for them to be recused. That there is an overwhelming potential for conflict between personal interest and the firm’s is pretty clear in that case.

◧◩◪
5. favori+c3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:30:29
>>babl-y+l1
Because it's a conflict of interest - a CEO should absolutely recuse themselves from a vote on whether they should be removed. If a CEO refused to do so, the board should adjourn and reconvene without the CEO present.
◧◩
6. SkyPun+K6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:47:40
>>dnissl+e
Given he was the subject of the vote, he likely wouldn’t even be able to participate.
◧◩◪
7. hnaray+3R[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:16:25
>>babl-y+l1
Do you mean X?
[go to top]