zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
6 comments
1. jjorda+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 20:37:34
Sounds like a hostile takeover to me. Waiting to hear Sam's side of the story.
replies(3):
>>BudaDu+t8
>>Alexan+aa
>>Sturge+ib
◧
2. BudaDu+t8
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 21:05:25
>>jjorda+(OP)
Exactly what I was thinking but per another HN comment, the board doesn't have any share in the company. It's still very fishy
replies(1):
>>bertil+UC
◧
3. Alexan+aa
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 21:12:57
>>jjorda+(OP)
Would be really interesting if Microsoft wanted to acquire the whole thing and Sam stood in the way.
replies(1):
>>yokopr+Rh
◧
4. Sturge+ib
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 21:17:20
>>jjorda+(OP)
Perhaps something to do with the agreement that Microsoft only gets access to the pre-AGI AI and MS wanted the good stuff?
◧◩
5. yokopr+Rh
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-17 21:44:29
>>Alexan+aa
Most plausible hypothesis I’ve read so far
◧◩
6. bertil+UC
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-17 23:29:34
>>BudaDu+t8
Military contract or sharing raw data with CIA, Palantir, Mossad, etc. would explain why they intervened (and why Sam and Greg couldn’t be candid: gag order).
replies(1):
>>bertil+SG4
◧◩◪
7. bertil+SG4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 02:22:17
>>bertil+UC
I probably should retract all those, but I want to argue that the board claiming "not candid" was (as of what we know now) entirely off.
[go to top]