zlacker

Absolutely. A former student of mine worked for a non profit in Afghanistan (his home country) for a few years. Said non profit was flying in McKinsey consultants for very short gigs at six figures (USD).

Same can be said about many LGBT non profits that have shifted their goals in the developed world on the "T" part of the acronym. On countries where marriage equality is a given, no one is going to fund an NGO focused on gay marriage... so they need a new cause to fight for.

>>morava+(OP)
to me this smells transphobic but it's possible the trans genocide several US states are working on made me oversensitive

>>_ugfj+u2
How is it transphobic to say organizations focused on LGBTQ shifted their alignment for the one part that isn't widely accepted in developed because others for the most part are?

>>lannis+qd1
Its a transphobic conspiracy theory to say, as moravak1984 explicitly did upthread, that they did it for money not because its an actual real issue where they perceive an injustice, whereas the issues where they've already won, and thus are shifting some attention from, are not, or less so, specifically because they have succeeded in shifting the situation on the ground.

>>dragon+df1
Why is it transphobic? Is it not possible for an organization to do something for money? I am not accusing any particular organization of doing so, but it absolutely should be a legitimate concern/question.

In fact, I would consider it transphobic to not call out organizations with ulterior motives.

>>lannis+qd1
The reply to my suspicion was so transphobic it got removed. I can smell these people from a mile away. Fragments of it survive in >>38301956

>>Ferret+r53
The reply to my suspicion from the same person was so transphobic it got removed. I can smell these people from a mile away. Fragments of it survive in >>38301956

>>chx+w24
My reply was calling out your ridiculous and hyperbolic claims of "genocide", and examining the reality behind the euphemism.