zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. novok+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:25:00
It’s not about legitimacy but having a bootstrapped contact list to talk to along with other user friction reasons
replies(1): >>serial+14
2. serial+14[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:45:48
>>novok+(OP)
In that case it doesn't make sense to make it required.

Sure, I don't mind if they ask for my phone number if they think that's a better default onboarding flow, but allow users to bypass it.

With all that said, I don't think it's really only about user friction.

replies(1): >>illiac+I31
◧◩
3. illiac+I31[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 05:10:10
>>serial+14
they did not "make it required", Signal was just never developed to support anything else for username/registration. Which is what they have now almost corrected.
replies(1): >>serial+TB1
◧◩◪
4. serial+TB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 11:11:22
>>illiac+I31
sounds required to me.
replies(1): >>illiac+EP1
◧◩◪◨
5. illiac+EP1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 12:51:51
>>serial+TB1
It's wording then. Making something required sounds like an artificial limitation whereas implementing support for usernames requires a lot of work, it's not like they commented out a couple of lines on purpose.

What is required at the moment is any phone number, not your phone number. You can use a phone booth even.

[go to top]