zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. nottor+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:36:35
Ok, have they decoupled my identity from my phone number yet?

I mean, to donate to them I'd have to use it. I don't need another WhatsApp.

replies(1): >>contac+u6
2. contac+u6[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:04:28
>>nottor+(OP)
almost, usernames and phone number privacy are in testing now
replies(1): >>AnonHP+h7
◧◩
3. AnonHP+h7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-16 18:07:23
>>contac+u6
That’s only phone number privacy from other users. Registration would still require a phone number, which is what GP seems to be unhappy about.
replies(1): >>nottor+np
◧◩◪
4. nottor+np[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-16 19:32:27
>>AnonHP+h7
I don't see the point of all that encryption when the ends of a conversation are tied to publicly available info like a phone number.

Do you think $SECRET_POLICE will care that they can't decrypt my messages when they know I have exchanged said messages with a known dissident's phone number?

$SECRET_POLICE doesn't do innocent until proven guilty.

replies(1): >>contac+Nt
◧◩◪◨
5. contac+Nt[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-16 19:51:35
>>nottor+np
Signal's design for usernames and phone number privacy means they won't know

Also, dissidents aren't the only (and definitely not the primary) intended users for Signal

[go to top]