zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. AnonHP+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:07:23
That’s only phone number privacy from other users. Registration would still require a phone number, which is what GP seems to be unhappy about.
replies(1): >>nottor+6i
2. nottor+6i[view] [source] 2023-11-16 19:32:27
>>AnonHP+(OP)
I don't see the point of all that encryption when the ends of a conversation are tied to publicly available info like a phone number.

Do you think $SECRET_POLICE will care that they can't decrypt my messages when they know I have exchanged said messages with a known dissident's phone number?

$SECRET_POLICE doesn't do innocent until proven guilty.

replies(1): >>contac+wm
◧◩
3. contac+wm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-16 19:51:35
>>nottor+6i
Signal's design for usernames and phone number privacy means they won't know

Also, dissidents aren't the only (and definitely not the primary) intended users for Signal

[go to top]