It feels icky, but still I mostly agree. I do think there's a limit as I would consider directly influencing elections (via force or deceit) to be harmful, but I'm largely ok with trying to sway public opinion.
> They were notoriously ineffective, which further solidifies this into the non-story bucket.
Unfortunately, they were surprisingly effective at the thing I care about which is collecting millions of people's personal information without their knowledge or consent. The fact they turned out to be incompetent does not inspire confidence.
I think this is the core disagreement, I do not see this in itself as an actual harm, just icky feelings.