>>__loam+(OP)
There's nothing ideological about SAFe. It's simply a collection of best practices which work reasonably well in most organizations. You can pick and choose which pieces to adopt and which to ignore. Like any methodology, it can't compensate for toxic management, technical incompetence, or lack of product market fit.
If you don't like SAFe then please be specific. Which parts of it don't work if actually followed as documented?