zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. nradov+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-12 18:57:35
The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) simply calls it an iteration. This is a neutral term with no implications about the pace of work.

https://scaledagileframework.com/iterations/

replies(1): >>__loam+M11
2. __loam+M11[view] [source] 2023-10-13 01:27:58
>>nradov+(OP)
SAFe is a failed ideology: https://seandexter1.medium.com/beware-safe-the-scaled-agile-...
replies(1): >>nradov+ai1
◧◩
3. nradov+ai1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-13 03:53:45
>>__loam+M11
There's nothing ideological about SAFe. It's simply a collection of best practices which work reasonably well in most organizations. You can pick and choose which pieces to adopt and which to ignore. Like any methodology, it can't compensate for toxic management, technical incompetence, or lack of product market fit.

If you don't like SAFe then please be specific. Which parts of it don't work if actually followed as documented?

replies(1): >>__loam+wx1
◧◩◪
4. __loam+wx1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-13 06:25:50
>>nradov+ai1
I literally linked an article going through why SAFe is MBA garbage that misunderstands why agile was created in the first place but if that's not specific enough for you then I'm not sure what you're looking for.
replies(1): >>nradov+fA2
◧◩◪◨
5. nradov+fA2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-13 15:00:45
>>__loam+wx1
That article is garbage with no specifics. I don't know why you bothered to link it.
[go to top]